Sunday, April 3, 2016

The Accident

It was only recently that my college-age son got plowed into in an intersection a few blocks from our house. He was on his way to his (very) part-time job that he maintains to keep gas in his car and change in his pocket while in school. He had the right of way (eyewitnesses said for a solid 10-12 seconds) and the other driver clearly blew a very-red light. My son’s car got hit on the right front which spun him like a top; the impact bent the frame and destroyed the front clip of his beloved 25 year old Mazda Piñata (err… Miata). But he has quick reflexes and saw it coming, so he did some evasive maneuvering. I am satisfied based on what I saw at the scene that if my son hadn’t reacted quickly he would have been in the hospital.

The radiator was destroyed on my son’s car, so I overheard some of the police report as I showed up with my trusty log-chain to help him pull the sorry wreck home. I understand that the other driver had been swerving as he drove towards the intersection and that after the collision he stopped long enough to get out and look at the damage he caused. He then got back in his mangled car and drove away. Whether the guy was drunk or simply looking at his phone is a mystery to any of us. What isn’t a mystery is that he hit and ran. A couple of ladies sitting at the (red) light got pictures of him getting out of his car and also of his license plate, so it is hopeful that the police can track him down.

Likely this guy was one of those who couldn’t afford insurance and chose to run because he had none. Who knows; he might have even had his license pulled because of priors without insurance. Uninsured motorists seem more and more commonplace in urban areas. I suspect that the issue will continue to grow; rent, utilities and groceries continue to ratchet up in cost, but wages don’t. Unfortunately, just because you can’t afford what it takes to maintain a driving privilege doesn’t mean you can get along without it.  

The urban financial cycle is vicious and unforgiving. Lower income folks have no ability to find employment other than what is within walking distance or along transit routes. These jobs often provide little, either in benefits or salary. They often can’t afford to drive, but need to because there are no decent jobs, grocery stores or department stores close to where they live. These areas can’t support this infrastructure as crime is inevitably high and insurance (there’s that word again) for a store owner is unaffordable due to frequent theft and robberies. Busses? Sure, it’s feasible to carve 2½ hours out for multiple rides and transfers to accommodate a ½hr grocery run. But which of us would see that as a real option?

Solutions are few and far between. Public transit meets only some needs. Jobs above minimum wage typically require education that many can’t afford and are often available only in areas that urbanites can’t access without personal transportation. And as demonstrated recently, even a 4-year degree offers little additional hope of securing a reasonable job. Many grads today find themselves working at the McDonalds up the street because it’s all that was available. (Based on my recent search I can testify that many companies are looking for 25 year-olds with 30 years of work experience, master degrees and willingness to work for $12/hr.)

And so this installment of my blog offers no solutions, only questions. My son had his life put off kilter by this accident, but he got out of it uninjured and is already seeing this as an opportunity to upgrade his rolling-stock. And no- he isn’t collecting against insurance as he only carried liability on the Piñata. The other guy? Who really knows?  If the City hunts him down to prosecute, it’s kind of a blood-out-of-a-turnip deal…  Yes, his behavior was wrong and needs to change. But I’m not sure it does anyone any good to cripple him that much more by taking away what he already doesn’t have to guarantee he can’t get set straight.

© 2016 D.W. Williams 

3 comments:

  1. Your right about a lot things here. For one, chasing this culprit would likely be a waste of time as far as money is concerned for all involved. No money is likely to change hands. While some to need to drive to get to a job, they don't have to drive drunk or irresponsibly. And while we'll never know the real cause in this case, it would be right to record the incident against him. A hit and run is unconscionable, and this individual should have to be a citizen like everyone else. Our society just can't work if everybody does not have to obey the law. Too much trouble for you to bother to show up at court for a whole day, probably for nothing? Yeah, I can understand that.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Good points Jeff. Regarding the criminal aspect of the hit and run, agreed, he needs to be held accountable. Regardless of the pain it may be, if the City or County asked me to testify for a prosecution on that account, I would chose to be there. This wreck belongs to my son though, so we'll see what he does if that opportunity comes up.

    Civil Litigation? that's where I see no possible positive outcome, either for my son or the perpetrator. The guy made a very bad choice. Likely in his mind it was the only choice available at that time-"if" he had no insurance or was lit. He knew that if he stopped he was going to lockup - What finances he had would evaporate that much more.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Been there. I hate that you had to go through this. When it is your children or family member It really hits home how awful it is. We have all made mistakes. I don't think getting a cash settlement is the right thing to do in most cases but the lawyer sure does. Losing money is no deterrent to a repeat offender. Glad to hear he was OK. That is what counts. Maybe he will become more observant/defensive. Sure do miss your mug coming round! Fasl

    ReplyDelete